Close
Serving Clients Throughout Upstate New York with Multiple Convenient Locations

Articles Posted in Surgical Malpractice

Updated:

Court Discusses Proximate Cause in New York Surgical Malpractice Case

Surgeons are highly skilled and trained and are required to provide treatment commensurate with their training. Surgeons sometimes fall short of the standard of care, however, and when they do, they should be held accountable for any harm they cause. A New York appellate court recently discussed what constitutes sufficient…

Updated:

New York Court Discusses a Hospital’s Liability for a Resident’s Acts

In many cases in which a person is injured by inadequate medical care there will be more than one entity or care provider liable for his or her harm. For example, hospitals can be held accountable for harm caused by a resident due to an improperly performed procedure. Recently, the…

Updated:

Court Discusses Standard for Setting Aside a Jury’s Verdict in a New York Medical Malpractice Case

In most New York medical malpractice cases, the plaintiff will request a trial by a jury of his or her peers. Thus, if the case proceeds to trial, the jury will determine issues of fact and credibility, and render a verdict based on its assessment. Although jury trials are an…

Updated:

New York Court Reverses Verdict Finding No Surgical Malpractice as Against the Weight of the Evidence

In most surgical malpractice cases, the plaintiff will elect to have a jury decide whether the defendant doctor should be held liable for the plaintiff’s harm. Juries do not always assess liability accurately, however, and in some cases, a jury will issue a verdict that is in opposition to the…

Updated:

New York Court Discusses Sufficiency of Evidence Needed to Defeat Summary Judgment in a Surgical Malpractice Case

In surgical malpractice cases, there is a shifting burden from the defendant to the plaintiff to provide competent evidence to prove whether there is sufficient evidence to show that the defendant deviated from the accepted standard of care. In most cases, each party will produce an expert affidavit supporting his…

Updated:

New York Court Rules Dead Man’s Statute Does Not Preclude Evidence of Written Consent in a Medical Malpractice Case

Prior to surgery, the physician performing the surgery will typically obtain the patient’s informed consent. The process of obtaining informed consent involves advising the patient of any potential risks to the surgery and asking if the patient understands the risks and consents to the surgery regardless of the risks it…

Updated:

New York Court Explains Standard for Granting a Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Medical Malpractice Cases

Surgeons are required to possess the skills and training of other surgeons in their local community. As such, for a plaintiff to recover on a surgical malpractice claim he or she must show, in part, that the defendant surgeon performed the operation in a manner that deviated from the accepted…

Updated:

Court Affirms New York Jury’s Finding that Doctor’s Negligence did not Cause the Alleged Harm

Medical malpractice claims typically allege that a medical provider negligently breached the standard of care and therefore, the provider should be responsible for any harm the injured party sustained because of the inadequate care. To recover under a medical malpractice claim alleging negligence, in addition to proving that the medical…

Updated:

New York Court Finds an Issue of Fact Exists as to When Treatment Ended in a Medical Malpractice Case

Under New York law, medical malpractice actions must be filed within two and a half years of the last date of treatment or they may be barred as untimely. Depending on the nature of the relationship between the patient and treatment provider, however, the last date of treatment may be…

Contact Us
Start Chat