Serving Clients Throughout Upstate New York with Multiple Convenient Locations Syracuse | Oneida | Watertown | New Hartford | Binghamton | Cortland | Rochester | Oswego | Albany | Buffalo

When it comes to the most popular elective medical procedures available today, LASIK eye surgery is at the top of the list. Every year, millions of people choose to get rid of their glasses by having LASIK procedures performed on their eyes, but there is an unfortunate side effect: the number of LASIK malpractice lawsuits filed against surgeons or facilities where the procedure is performed has increased in the years since LASIK was invented. Eye enhancement, vision correction, and LASIK surgery have all become very common procedures in the United States, and while the treatments can be beneficial and successful, the risks of the procedures may not be as well-known or as publicized as they should be. Mistakes in laser eye surgery and LASIK can result in severe vision problems and permanent injury, including vision loss and total blindness.  If you have been harmed as a result of LASIK malpractice in Upstate New York, the attorneys at DeFrancisco & Falgiatano may be able to assist you.  We serve clients throughout Upstate New York and have offices in several convenient locations. Our extensive experience in the field of medical malpractice is reflected in the results we have obtained for our clients.

LASIK, which stands for Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis, was developed by Greek doctors in 1990. Because it is considered a cosmetic procedure, the procedure, which costs about $4,100 on average, is not covered by most health insurance plans. The procedure entails making a surgical incision in the corneal tissue of the eye and then reshaping the eye with a laser.  Myopia (nearsightedness), hyperopia (farsightedness), and astigmatism are all treated with LASIK procedures. The majority of patients seek the procedure to be free of the inconvenience of glasses or contacts.

Most LASIK-related complications will resolve themselves after a few weeks of recovery time. However, a significant number of patients have reported long-term or even permanent debilitating visual problems such as halos or double vision, development of severe dry eye, bulging eye cornea, under-correction or over-correction, pain, light sensitivity, macular holes, blurry vision, or even blindness. While there is no official complication rate, some LASIK surgeons claim a rate of around 1%, which many believe is far too low. However, serious complications associated with LASIK surgery should make consumers reconsider whether they should proceed with the procedure. As early as 2014, FDA officials reported that nearly half of the subjects who were symptom-free before LASIK reported visual symptoms such as halos, starbursts, glare, and ghosting after LASIK surgery. Almost 30% of patients who had no dry eye symptoms prior to LASIK developed dry eye symptoms after the procedure.

Malpractice suits in the Empire State can take numerous shapes. Lawsuits can be filed against any healthcare provider, including dentists and dental hygienists. First responders including EMTs, paramedics, and ambulance drivers seldom face claims of medical negligence, but they do occur.

Paramedics and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were likely the initial responders to any medical emergency you’ve ever experienced. First responders play a crucial role in the treatment of patients with life-threatening injuries or illnesses. They need to get to patients quickly and effectively. A patient’s prognosis and the likelihood of making a full recovery from an illness or injury are significantly affected by how well they are cared for by a paramedic.

Medical evaluations and emergency care are provided by paramedics and EMTs, however, they do not have medical degrees and are not doctors. It can be challenging to argue that they should be held accountable when their mistakes result in injury to others, as they are generally shielded from culpability. A victim of first responder negligence may be entitled to compensation in some circumstances and should consult a lawyer about their legal options. The aggressive attorneys at DeFrancisco & Falgiatano in Upstate New York know what it takes to win medical malpractice cases. If you were hurt because of a negligent EMT or paramedic, we will do all in our power to get you the compensation you deserve. We have offices throughout Upstate New York to better serve our injured clients. The success we’ve had for our clients in cases involving medical negligence is a direct reflection of our years of experience in the industry.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NECK-re-tie-zing FASH-e-i-tis) is a fatal bacterial infection that spreads quickly. The term “necrotizing” refers to something that causes the death of another. The term “fasciitis” refers to inflammation of the fascia, which is the subcutaneous (under the skin) tissue that surrounds muscles and nerves and holds everything in place, including fat and blood vessels. Necrotizing fasciitis, also known as “Flesh-Eating Disease,” causes gangrenous changes, tissue death, and systemic disease, and frequently results in the patient’s death. Every year, between 600 and 700 cases are diagnosed in the United States. About 25% to 30% of those cases result in death. Necrotizing fasciitis kills about one in every three people.

If necrotizing fasciitis is detected and treated early, the chances of survival without more severe consequences are significantly higher than if the necrotizing fasciitis is not detected and treated until it has progressed to a more advanced stage. Any unnecessary delay in diagnosing or treating necrotizing fasciitis can have tragic consequences. Unfortunately, warning signs are often ignored, and treatment is delayed. The most common forms of negligence or medical malpractice by physicians in diagnosing and/or treating patients with necrotizing fasciitis include failing to test for necrotizing fasciitis when a patient reports warning signs or symptoms that can be caused by necrotizing fasciitis, delaying necrotizing fasciitis diagnosis, failing to order appropriate treatment for a patient with necrotizing fasciitis, and failing to follow up with the patient. A doctor may violate his or her professional duty of care by performing an incorrect differential diagnosis. A healthcare provider creates a list of potential diagnoses and then tests each one to rule out all but the correct diagnosis. Doctors can also violate the professional standard of care by misreading test results, failing to treat necrotizing fasciitis with antibiotics quickly, or administering an incorrect antibiotic or dose. If you or someone you care about has suffered from serious complications of necrotizing fasciitis as a result of a physician’s or another health care provider’s negligence, you should contact an attorney right away to see if you can file a medical malpractice or, in some cases, wrongful death lawsuit. Contact DeFrancisco & Falgiatano for a free case evaluation. We serve clients throughout Upstate New York, with offices in several convenient locations. Our extensive experience in the field of medical malpractice is reflected in the results we have obtained for our clients.

A common misconception about necrotizing fasciitis is that the condition is caused by only ONE type of bacteria. Several types of bacteria can cause the condition, the most common of which is Group A Streptococcus, the same bacteria that causes strep throat. While Group A strep bacteria are the most common cause of necrotizing fasciitis, it can also be caused by bacteria found in water. Other bacteria that cause necrotizing fasciitis include Escherichia coli (“E Coli”), Clostridium, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas, Prevotella, Klebsiella, Vibrio vulnificus, and Staphylococcus aureus. This type of deep tissue infection can overwhelm the immune system, resulting in sepsis and/or sepsis shock. Sepsis is a complication caused by an infection. When we have sepsis, our bodies release chemicals into our bloodstream to fight infection. However, the sudden injection of chemicals can cause inflammation, which can lead to other dangerous conditions and symptoms such as multiple organ failure, fever, difficulty breathing, mental confusion, low blood pressure, and even death.

Colon cancer is a type of cancer that affects the large intestine (colon), which is located at the bottom of the digestive system. Rectal cancer is cancer of the colon’s last six inches. They are referred to collectively as colorectal cancers. Nearly 150,000 men and women are diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the United States each year. Colorectal cancer, also known as colon cancer, can affect both men and women and is the second most lethal type of cancer in the United States. Colon cancer is treatable with proper screening and diagnosis. It is even preventable in many cases.

Unfortunately, many patients suffer as a result of a doctor’s negligence. Cancer is sometimes diagnosed too late, which can result in a much worse prognosis. If you believe you have been harmed as a result of a failure to diagnose colon cancer, contact the medical malpractice lawyers at DeFrancisco & Falgiatano for a free case evaluation. Our experienced cancer malpractice attorneys may be able to assist patients in seeking accountability and fair compensation for colon cancer misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. We have offices in several convenient locations throughout Upstate New York. Our extensive experience in the field of medical malpractice is reflected in the outcomes we have obtained for our clients.

Colon cancer frequently begins as a small, noncancerous group of cells known as polyps. These cells develop within the colon. These polyps can become cancerous over time. Because the polyps are small, they do not cause many symptoms. Most doctors recommend annual cancer screenings to detect and remove polyps before they develop into cancer. The removal of a polyp before it becomes malignant prevents the polyp from developing into colorectal cancer. This is why procedures like colonoscopy can help prevent the development of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colonoscopy allows colorectal cancer to be detected early before it has spread to other organs or tissue in the body. The difference in outcome is significant. The National Cancer Institute reports five-year survival rates of more than 90% when cancer is detected before it spreads and, tragically, less than 10% when cancer is detected after it has spread.

Losing weight is hard. Many people yo-yo diet for decades, ending up heavier than when they began. Many people suffering from obesity have turned to bariatric surgery to lose weight, including procedures such as gastric bypass, gastric sleeve, and lap band surgeries. These bariatric procedures have many risks involved and should be performed only on people who are significantly overweight and who have exhausted other weight loss options.  Gastric bypass is an umbrella term that describes several different types of surgeries. All of them share a basic similarity. The surgeon staples or reroutes the stomach so that a person loses weight. Often, the surgery causes a person to feel full much faster than they otherwise would. The surgery also causes food to bypass parts of the small intestines so that it is not absorbed. This malabsorption reduces the number of calories a person consumes.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans each year undergo gastric bypass surgery, either performed laparoscopically or through a large incision in the abdomen. This surgery carries risks, like all surgery. They also present the possibility of significant complications such as gastritis, bowel obstruction, hemorrhage, bleeding, anastomotic ulcers, anastomotic strictures, and hernia. All surgeries also present a risk of bacterial contamination, which may result in a severe and immediate infection.  Some surgeons neglect patients after the operation and fail to note complications.  Preventable gastric bypass surgery errors have led to disastrous, even permanently life-altering consequences.

Tragically, many of those who turn to bariatric procedures such as gastric bypass surgery suffer severe medical setbacks or lose their lives due to medical negligence. In either case, victims and their families can suffer financial, physical, and emotional challenges, with medical bills mounting and complications worsening. To account for these extensive losses and damages, injured patients and/or their families may file bariatric surgery lawsuits to seek fair compensation for their injuries.  Patients who have been catastrophically injured because of preventable gastric bypass errors may be entitled to pursue compensation for injuries or complications that result from medical negligence. If you believe you have been injured because of preventable gastric bypass errors, contact the medical malpractice attorneys at DeFrancisco & Falgiatano for a review of your case.  We help clients throughout the Upstate New York area with offices in multiple convenient locations. Our extensive experience in the medical malpractice field is reflected in the results we have achieved for our clients.

Bacterial meningitis is a rare but potentially fatal disease. Several types of bacteria can cause an upper respiratory tract infection and then travel through the bloodstream to the brain. The disease can also occur when certain bacteria invade the meninges directly. Bacterial meningitis can cause stroke, hearing loss, and permanent brain damage.  Bacterial meningitis causes inflammation around the membranes of the brain and spinal cord due to a bacterial infection. This inflammation leads to increased intracranial pressure and can cause a catastrophic brain injury or death if the patient does not quickly receive proper medical treatment.  However, most people recover from bacterial meningitis if it is diagnosed and treated quickly.  If you were harmed by bacterial meningitis and you suspect the harm was caused by medical malpractice, you should consult the experienced personal injury and medical malpractice attorneys at DeFrancisco & Falgiatano.  We help clients throughout the Upstate New York area with offices in multiple convenient locations. Our extensive experience in the medical malpractice field is reflected in the results we have achieved for our clients.

Some forms of bacterial meningitis are contagious and can be spread through contact with saliva,

nasal discharge, feces, and respiratory and throat secretions.  These are often spread through kissing, coughing, sharing drinking glasses or eating utensils, or such personal items as toothbrushes, lipstick, or cigarettes.  Outbreaks of bacterial meningitis can occur in living situations where you are in close contact with others. People sharing a household, at a daycare center, or in a classroom with an infected person can become infected. College students living in dormitories, in particular, college freshmen, have a higher risk of contracting meningococcal meningitis than college students overall. Children who have not been given routine vaccines are at increased risk of developing certain types of bacterial meningitis.

The majority of patients trust their doctors to correctly diagnose their medical conditions and provide adequate treatment. Unfortunately, in some cases, medical professionals fail to properly diagnose a medical condition. One medical condition that is often misdiagnosed is deep vein thrombosis (DVT).  Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition that occurs when a blood clot forms within a deep vein of the arms, pelvis, or legs. Sometimes these clots move through the bloodstream and become lodged in an artery in the lung, blocking the blood flow in what is known as a pulmonary embolism. Certain individuals are at greater risk of suffering from a DVT including people who are obese, smokers, patients who have had recent surgery, advanced age, kidney problems, pregnancy, or those who are immobile for a long period. If your doctor failed to diagnose or treat your deep vein thrombosis, you should discuss your situation with the experienced Syracuse medical malpractice attorneys of DeFrancisco & Falgiatano.

Internal blood clots can form for many different reasons.  In addition to the above referred potential risks, a genetic autoimmune disorder called an antiphospholipid syndrome, or sticky blood, causes the body to attack otherwise beneficial or benign proteins in the body, causing blood clots to form. Regardless of the cause of the clot, it can be potentially dangerous. If a clot travels to the heart or lungs, it can cause breathing problems or even a heart attack. If it travels to the brain, it can cause a stroke. Particularly dangerous blood clots can be treated quickly with surgery, but a doctor must catch the clot in time.

Tests used to diagnose or rule out DVT include:

Typically, parties in a personal injury case will rely on jurors to assess the evidence presented and determine issues of fault and damages. Although jurors are not legal professionals, they are expected to issue verdicts that align with a reasonable evaluation of the evidence. If a jury fails to meet this expectation, their verdict may be vacated. Recently, a New York court discussed the grounds for setting aside a jury’s verdict in a case arising out of a motor vehicle accident. If you sustained injuries in a car crash caused by another party’s negligence, you have the right to seek redress, and it is in your best interest to talk to a Syracuse personal injury attorney about your potential claims.

Factual and Procedural History

It is alleged that the plaintiff was involved in a collision with a bus operated by the defendant driver and owned by the defendant company. The plaintiff sustained injuries in the crash; as such, she filed personal injury claims against the defendants. The case was tried before a jury that ultimately issued a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability.

Reportedly, the jury issued a separate verdict in which it awarded her over $800,000 in damages for future pain and suffering. The defendants filed a motion to set aside the verdict and for judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Alternatively, the defendants argued that the verdict should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. The trial court denied the defendants’ motion, and they appealed. Continue Reading ›

Medical malpractice cases are typically a battle between the party’s experts. As such, if the court prohibits a plaintiff’s expert from testifying, it can greatly impair their ability to establish liability. In some instances, though, a plaintiff may be able to successfully argue that their expert was improperly precluded from testifying, as shown in a recent opinion delivered in a New York medical malpractice case. If you suffered harm due to inadequate medical care, you might be owed compensation, and it is smart to meet with a Syracuse medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible.

Factual and Procedural History

It is reported that the plaintiff underwent a hysterectomy that was performed by the defendant. Following the surgery, she developed necrotizing fasciitis. She subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, arguing that his negligent post-surgical care constituted medical malpractice. Prior to trial, the defendant moved to preclude the plaintiff’s expert from testifying regarding the cause of her infection. The court granted the motion, and the case proceeded to trial. The jury ultimately found in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

Grounds for Precluding Expert Testimony in Medical Malpractice Cases

On appeal, the plaintiff argued, among other things, that the trial court erred in barring her expert from offering testimony. The court agreed and ultimately reversed the trial court ruling and remanded the matter for further proceedings. In doing so, the court explained that each party must identify the person they intend to call to testify as an expert witness at trial, disclose the subject matter of their testimony, and offer their qualifications. Continue Reading ›

It is not uncommon for more than one doctor to perform surgery on a patient. If the patient subsequently suffers harm due to mistakes made during the procedure, the surgeon in charge of the patient’s care may be deemed liable for medical malpractice, even if other doctors participated in the surgery. This was demonstrated in a recent New York ruling in which the court found that factual issues existed as to whether the defendant surgeon caused the plaintiff’s harm and reversed the trial court ruling dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. If you were hurt during a medical procedure, it is in your best interest to speak with a Syracuse medical malpractice lawyer about what claims you may be able to pursue.

The History of the Case

It is reported that the plaintiff suffered from abnormal uterine bleeding. As such, she underwent a hysterectomy that was performed by the defendant and another non-party doctor. The defendant operated on the right side of the plaintiff’s body, and the non-party doctor operated on the left; the plaintiff experienced excessive bleeding on the left side. After the surgery, the plaintiff reported urinary incontinence.

Allegedly, diagnostic imaging subsequently revealed that her ureter was severed during the procedure. She underwent additional surgeries to repair her injuries. She then instituted medical malpractice claims against the defendant. Following discovery, the defendant moved for dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint via summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appealed. Continue Reading ›

Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
Rue Ratings - Best Attorneys of America
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
National Association of Distinguished Counsel
Avvo Rating
Martindalle Hubbel
Best Law Firms
Contact Information